I mean the question literally, and I think everyone in this field should answer it. Not โdo you want your place to prosperโ – everyone wants that, the way everyone wants good weather. I mean: does your institution intend to become genuinely excellent at the discipline of changing a local economy, judged by results people can feel?
Because there is no point being mediocre at this work. Mediocre economic development consumes public money, burns a decade nobody can get back, and leaves the estate, the high street and the school-leaver exactly where they were.
Nobody sets out to be mediocre, of course. But greatness is a choice before it is a capability – and most institutions have never explicitly made it. The programmes tick over. The strategy gets refreshed. The partnership meets. And adequacy quietly becomes the ambition.
Here is what I have learned in thirty years in this field: the places that transform themselves are the ones that decided to be great at the work itself – the evidence, the relationships, the delivery, the proof – long before the powers or the money arrived.
๐พ๐ค๐ข๐ข๐๐ฉ ๐ฉ๐ค ๐๐๐๐ฃ๐ ๐๐ง๐๐๐ฉ. This might help www.lredhandbook.com
This post is part of the prosperity in every postcode series. To deliver this โ we need to be truly great at local and regional economic development. Follow me to get these posts prioritised in your LinkedIn newsfeed.
hashtag#EconomicDevelopment hashtag#LocalGovernment hashtag#Devolution hashtag#Leadership hashtag#PublicSector
The Blank Looks
No, not the name of an indie pop band from the 1980s (although it's a kinda cool name, eh?!). Its the response I usually get when I ask a local authority "Do you have a list of your most important employers - and a system of account management for them?" The blank...











